Friday, 31 March 2017
Friday, 24 March 2017
Q3. What have you learned from your audience feedback?
The type of audience who would watch our short film would be the younger generation and short film fanatics. They are people who are into thriller and are interested in the plot.
When we first asked our teacher to look at our film, the type of feedback he gave us was mainly about the sound editing as it wasn't our strongest point. He helped us understand sound bridging and create cleaner cuts on some shots. This improved the continuity and audio of our short film. With this improved version, we then uploaded the draft onto YouTube. I then created a Facebook post which included links to the short film and the survey I created. The results are on this slide share below:
After looking at these responses I have learned that the majority have watched short films before therefore they may have compared our short film to others. Most of my responses were females aged 12-18 and because our short film was about the death of a loved one, their views on it may vary from experience. However, they all said that the title described the short film very well. I think these positive responses to Q4 made me realise how much a word can create impact and it can also make the audience remember the name because it is just one word. After looking at the cinematography responses for Q6. I have found that some liked the shakiness of the camera but others didn't. This links in with Stuart Hall's encoding theory. I think that the third and fourth answer had a negotiated reading response because they had different views on what the director's purpose of it was. Originally, we wanted to have that shaky camera effect to show that Derek's on edge, or that he doesn't know what's going on and that he is basically delusional. However the fourth answer to Q6 suggests that we should've focused on him more so that we could see him and all our attention goes to Derek. What I have learned from this response is that people have different opinions and that it can be difficult to clearly show the purpose of why we added that shot or that sound effect etc.
On the other hand for Q7, the responses varied from good and bad. This question focused on the audio of our short film and the bit that affected people's opinions were the bird sound effect. One said it didn't make sense for it to be included and the other person said that the overall soundtrack was okay. Looking at these responses, I have learnt that we may need to improve the sound editing in the dialogue scene and make sure that the sound is kept at the same volume at all times so that there's no confusion and better continuity. In addition, I have also learned that this may be a skill that needs to improve and to better understand the effectiveness of sound.
For Q9, I had many different approaches to the ending. Some said it was good, and others gave me points on how it could've ended. What I have learned from this is that many people wanted it to end differently. For example answer number 5 said that the brother could've faded away whilst Harry's character Derek smiled as he came to terms with his brother's death. In my opinion, the ending could've finished with a shot like that but that wasn't our purpose. When we were producing the film, Harry came up with the idea that once he looked up he finds that he disappeared so suddenly. This then suggests that he was never physically there and that he had been following a fragment of his memory instead. However, if Eric were to fade away and Harry smiles it would've made sense and it would have had a positive ending but we wanted to leave the audience confused and we wanted them to question what actually happened. Answer number 3 supports this.
In relation to the Narrative theory, Roland Barthes' enigma code links in with this. From the beginning we wanted the audience to question what was happening and ask questions like why does he look pale/ out of character/ a little bit dazed. This was shown throughout the bathroom and dialogue scene when he didn't know what was going on. He wasn't ready to be part of the society again because he's still in mourning. We added these scenes so that it made the audience want to keep watching and to understand why he's following a ghost and be part of that journey as to where he ends up. If we didn't add these enigma codes the audience would've felt like the plot's not progressing and that it's a little boring to watch. We also included symbolic codes to let the audience instantly think that this is what it represents e.g. flowers and in memory of poster suggests that there was an accident. To sum it up, these responses vary depending on how well the audience caught on and I have also learned that these opinions could have only been generated through influence (e.g. things that they have seen before) and personal experience.
When we first asked our teacher to look at our film, the type of feedback he gave us was mainly about the sound editing as it wasn't our strongest point. He helped us understand sound bridging and create cleaner cuts on some shots. This improved the continuity and audio of our short film. With this improved version, we then uploaded the draft onto YouTube. I then created a Facebook post which included links to the short film and the survey I created. The results are on this slide share below:
After looking at these responses I have learned that the majority have watched short films before therefore they may have compared our short film to others. Most of my responses were females aged 12-18 and because our short film was about the death of a loved one, their views on it may vary from experience. However, they all said that the title described the short film very well. I think these positive responses to Q4 made me realise how much a word can create impact and it can also make the audience remember the name because it is just one word. After looking at the cinematography responses for Q6. I have found that some liked the shakiness of the camera but others didn't. This links in with Stuart Hall's encoding theory. I think that the third and fourth answer had a negotiated reading response because they had different views on what the director's purpose of it was. Originally, we wanted to have that shaky camera effect to show that Derek's on edge, or that he doesn't know what's going on and that he is basically delusional. However the fourth answer to Q6 suggests that we should've focused on him more so that we could see him and all our attention goes to Derek. What I have learned from this response is that people have different opinions and that it can be difficult to clearly show the purpose of why we added that shot or that sound effect etc.
On the other hand for Q7, the responses varied from good and bad. This question focused on the audio of our short film and the bit that affected people's opinions were the bird sound effect. One said it didn't make sense for it to be included and the other person said that the overall soundtrack was okay. Looking at these responses, I have learnt that we may need to improve the sound editing in the dialogue scene and make sure that the sound is kept at the same volume at all times so that there's no confusion and better continuity. In addition, I have also learned that this may be a skill that needs to improve and to better understand the effectiveness of sound.
For Q9, I had many different approaches to the ending. Some said it was good, and others gave me points on how it could've ended. What I have learned from this is that many people wanted it to end differently. For example answer number 5 said that the brother could've faded away whilst Harry's character Derek smiled as he came to terms with his brother's death. In my opinion, the ending could've finished with a shot like that but that wasn't our purpose. When we were producing the film, Harry came up with the idea that once he looked up he finds that he disappeared so suddenly. This then suggests that he was never physically there and that he had been following a fragment of his memory instead. However, if Eric were to fade away and Harry smiles it would've made sense and it would have had a positive ending but we wanted to leave the audience confused and we wanted them to question what actually happened. Answer number 3 supports this.
In relation to the Narrative theory, Roland Barthes' enigma code links in with this. From the beginning we wanted the audience to question what was happening and ask questions like why does he look pale/ out of character/ a little bit dazed. This was shown throughout the bathroom and dialogue scene when he didn't know what was going on. He wasn't ready to be part of the society again because he's still in mourning. We added these scenes so that it made the audience want to keep watching and to understand why he's following a ghost and be part of that journey as to where he ends up. If we didn't add these enigma codes the audience would've felt like the plot's not progressing and that it's a little boring to watch. We also included symbolic codes to let the audience instantly think that this is what it represents e.g. flowers and in memory of poster suggests that there was an accident. To sum it up, these responses vary depending on how well the audience caught on and I have also learned that these opinions could have only been generated through influence (e.g. things that they have seen before) and personal experience.
Q4. How did you use media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?
There are many different media technologies that I used during the production of my short film. For the research and planning stage, I mainly used websites to look up information which I could then analyse and link it to the development of my short film. An example of this would be the blogger site. This website contains blog posts relevant to the production of my short film. The first couple of posts were about the preliminary task, but then it slowly moved on to thinking about what our short film could be about. It included a mind map of topics and themes which we could focus on. After deciding that we wanted to create a short film using the thriller genre, I wrote down character traits which could link in with our actual audience and created audience profiles using an avatar website.
Although we wanted to stick with the thriller genre we had to make sure what the audience wanted to see was part of our short film. We used survey monkey to ask them questions like what would you like the main character to be? and what do you want to feel after watching the short film? Looking at my results I found that people wanted a male role and to feel intrigued at the end. Surprisingly, no one thought that we should make a short film in the thriller genre.
Moreover, during the research and planning stage I went on to look at thriller short films on YouTube. This helped me analyse certain codes and conventions which would fit into our film. E.g. ominous music and creepy characters. YouTube also allowed me to upload my own videos which I could then link onto my blog posts. This was very helpful because a normal MOV. file video would take twice as long to post onto blogger but on YouTube anyone can easily go on the site and look up the video if it didn't work. Specifically on our construction page, YouTube allowed me to upload our preliminary task and draft to our short film. On the other hand, YouTube wasn't the only site that helped me gather research; IMDb and google helped me look at posters for the thriller genre which I could then analyse and link in certain traits for the production of our poster.
The types of media technologies that I used in my research and planning was a software called Paint. I thought it would've been a good idea to use this software to draw out the storyboards but after realising that it would take a lot of time and effort I only managed to draw the first two shots. What I liked about this software is that it was easy to use and it wasn't so technical. Not only did it benefit me but it also helped me explore the artistic side of me again. You can easily hook up a tablet and pen to the computer and start drawing just like that. In addition, you can also paste images, crop them and edit the pixel size which could then be included in a blog post.
Lastly, Prezi was one of the sites I used instead of creating a power point. I used this site because it looked more glamorous than a simple PowerPoint. Moreover, I can easily log on and access it from any computer. I can edit any time I want and I can also use it to add pictures/ videos. Apart from Prezi, I also used slide share to show my results on my blog which I got from Survey Monkey. This is a site which can turn your power points into public ones which could be then embedded into a blog post. Just like Prezi its easy and simple to use and it displays your research in a more professional way.
However, after listing all the site I've used to help me with my research and planning, I couldn't have made the film without the hardware stuff. E.g. Camera, Tripod, Microphone. If I didn't have these things which the school nicely provided for us, we wouldn't have been able to create a high quality looking - short film. Moreover, we used Final cut pro on the Macs which allowed us to edit our film. This helped us cut videos and put them together and add in sound effects to create impact. We could also add in music which created tension and the feeling of mystery which is one of the thriller genre conventions.When our teacher helped us on certain parts to help improve our short film, I learned
new techniques like sound bridging. It also helped me develop my editing skills because I now know what looks good and sounds good.For example, the birds in the background sound effect helps add life and atmosphere to the shot. Another technology which helped produce the magazine article for our short film is Photoshop. This was very useful because you can layer images and add text. You can also cut out a person from the original image to make sure that the reader focuses on him (As you can see in the screenshot above.) Because I do A level Photography I'm used to playing around with Photoshop so I already knew how the tools work. My knowledge of Photoshop benefited me because it allowed me to create these two pages. However, the only reason I think this kind of format looks good is because I did my research on magazine articles and followed the codes and conventions. E.g. Include images from the film, director/ producer quotes and columns.
Overall, I think that the internet had a huge impact on the progress of my short film therefore, without blogger the website, I wouldn't have been able to collect and analyse information and put together all the ideas that relates to our short film. This includes using it for the construction and evaluation stages of my coursework.
Moreover, during the research and planning stage I went on to look at thriller short films on YouTube. This helped me analyse certain codes and conventions which would fit into our film. E.g. ominous music and creepy characters. YouTube also allowed me to upload my own videos which I could then link onto my blog posts. This was very helpful because a normal MOV. file video would take twice as long to post onto blogger but on YouTube anyone can easily go on the site and look up the video if it didn't work. Specifically on our construction page, YouTube allowed me to upload our preliminary task and draft to our short film. On the other hand, YouTube wasn't the only site that helped me gather research; IMDb and google helped me look at posters for the thriller genre which I could then analyse and link in certain traits for the production of our poster.The types of media technologies that I used in my research and planning was a software called Paint. I thought it would've been a good idea to use this software to draw out the storyboards but after realising that it would take a lot of time and effort I only managed to draw the first two shots. What I liked about this software is that it was easy to use and it wasn't so technical. Not only did it benefit me but it also helped me explore the artistic side of me again. You can easily hook up a tablet and pen to the computer and start drawing just like that. In addition, you can also paste images, crop them and edit the pixel size which could then be included in a blog post.
However, after listing all the site I've used to help me with my research and planning, I couldn't have made the film without the hardware stuff. E.g. Camera, Tripod, Microphone. If I didn't have these things which the school nicely provided for us, we wouldn't have been able to create a high quality looking - short film. Moreover, we used Final cut pro on the Macs which allowed us to edit our film. This helped us cut videos and put them together and add in sound effects to create impact. We could also add in music which created tension and the feeling of mystery which is one of the thriller genre conventions.When our teacher helped us on certain parts to help improve our short film, I learned
new techniques like sound bridging. It also helped me develop my editing skills because I now know what looks good and sounds good.For example, the birds in the background sound effect helps add life and atmosphere to the shot. Another technology which helped produce the magazine article for our short film is Photoshop. This was very useful because you can layer images and add text. You can also cut out a person from the original image to make sure that the reader focuses on him (As you can see in the screenshot above.) Because I do A level Photography I'm used to playing around with Photoshop so I already knew how the tools work. My knowledge of Photoshop benefited me because it allowed me to create these two pages. However, the only reason I think this kind of format looks good is because I did my research on magazine articles and followed the codes and conventions. E.g. Include images from the film, director/ producer quotes and columns.Overall, I think that the internet had a huge impact on the progress of my short film therefore, without blogger the website, I wouldn't have been able to collect and analyse information and put together all the ideas that relates to our short film. This includes using it for the construction and evaluation stages of my coursework.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)